The role of judgement in The Outsider :: English Literature

The role of judgement in The OutsiderThe motions of Meursault, the protagonist in The Outsider by AlbertCamus, argon characterized by ir perspicaciousity. For example, t here is no undefendable logical reason for his decision to marry Marie or to kill theArab. That evening, Marie came polish for me and asked me if I wantedto marry her. I said I didnt mind and we could do if she wanted to(Camus 44).However, the idea that things sometimes happen for no reason isdisturbing and threatening to society, because, as a logical culmination from that, individual existence could have happened for noreason and would in that locationfore be purposeless. Hence, society alwaysattempts to find logical reasons for every(prenominal)thing. In this novel,society superimposes its keen-sighted nature uponMeursaults irrational character, which has the consequence of societymaking judgements upon Meursault that atomic number 18 false, because thejudgements do not agree with his irrational personality . Theprosecutors reference and the meetings between the magistrate andMeursault will be used as examples to show this. sooner getting intothem, it must be explained that the prosecutor and the magistrate bothsymbolize society, since they are part of the chat up, which stands forsociety as a whole. The idea of a court already represents very muchsociety, since the law functions as the will of the people, and the venire sits in judgement on behalf of the entire community. But Camusclearly emphasizes upon this chassis of court-as-society in this novelby making almost all of the characters from the head start half reappear towitness in the trial The warden and the caretaker from the home,Thomas Prez, Raymond, Masson, Salamano, Marie and Cleste. First of all, the fact that the prosecutor interprets Meursaultsirrational action of killing the Arab in a rational way shows thatsociety imposes its rational character upon Meursaults irrationalpersonality. Meursault retelling the prosecuto rs argument Idasked him for his gun. Id gone back with the intention of using it. Idshot the Arab as Id planned. Id waited. And to make sure Id donethe job flop, Id fired four more shots, deliberately and atpoint-blank range and with some kind of forethought (96). Theprosecutor provides here a rational explanation for Meursaults murderof the Arab, that is, he explains how every step that lead to themurder was planned by Meursault. However, nothing in Meursaultsnarrative explains why he shot the Arab (let alone that there would beevidence in his narrative that he planned the murder), which suggeststhat there is no rational explanation for his action. Thus, the factthat the prosecutor, who represents society, interprets here Meursaults